Compare / qwen3-4b-instruct-2507 vs Claude Opus 4.5

qwen3-4b-instruct-2507 vs Claude Opus 4.5

18 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

qwen3-4b-instruct-2507
Alibaba · profile
Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricqwen3-4b-instruct-2507Claude Opus 4.5
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 6.7029.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 51.7%86.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 4.5%30.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 33.5%58.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 11.3%77.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 4.5%47.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 26.6%89.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 84.9%90.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 23.9%73.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 22.1%68.4%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 35.7%77.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 87.5%68.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 87.9%89.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 76.4%79.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 4.5%84.5%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 8.0%3.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.340.39
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 29.970.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.