Compare / qwen3-4b-instruct-2507 vs GPT-5.2

qwen3-4b-instruct-2507 vs GPT-5.2

18 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

qwen3-4b-instruct-2507
Alibaba · profile
GPT-5.2
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricqwen3-4b-instruct-2507GPT-5.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 6.7030.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 51.7%90.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 4.5%37.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 33.5%75.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 11.3%82.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 4.5%47.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 26.6%84.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 84.9%87.3%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 23.9%45.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 22.1%43.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 35.7%55.9%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 87.5%75.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 87.9%81.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 76.4%70.4%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 4.5%75.5%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 8.0%76.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.340.40
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 29.949.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.