Compare / Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 5.5

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 5.5

47 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Alibaba · profile
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
47
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.8 Max (0902)Claude Opus 5.5
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 3.0%0.6%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 93.3%97.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 3.6%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 1.8%1.8%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 10.1%37.5%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 1.8%17.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 4.581.61
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 83.3%57.1%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 19.6%15.5%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 2.4%1.8%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel compliance% of products 100.0%100.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 0.6%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usConflicts caught% of conflicts 100.0%100.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 94.2%97.8%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usCost per productUS dollars $0.0256$0.0400
CatalogBenchmeasured by usDecision accuracy% of decisions 93.4%97.8%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 3.6%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usField accuracy% of missing fields 90.3%92.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usInvented values% of filled values 2.7%0.5%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 3.6%3.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 53.0%72.6%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 33.9%58.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 22.6%14.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 0.640.41
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 21.4%15.5%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 1.8%1.8%
ROASBenchmeasured by usAudience scorescore out of 100 39.767.7
ROASBenchmeasured by usBusiness scorescore out of 100 15.652.3
ROASBenchmeasured by usConsistency scorescore out of 100 19.233.8
ROASBenchmeasured by usContribution profitsimulated US dollars $99,775$911,566
ROASBenchmeasured by usCost of a runUS dollars $0.73$1.06
ROASBenchmeasured by usMonths over budgetmonths of 12 20
ROASBenchmeasured by usOverall scorescore out of 100 25.451.6
ROASBenchmeasured by usPlanning scorescore out of 100 54.854.6
ROASBenchmeasured by usReturn on ad spendprofit per $1 spent $0.09$0.69
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate 0.050.16
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate 0.040.19
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate 0.020.14
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate -0.010.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4801,499
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4671,521
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5101,556
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4721,516
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4791,509
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4721,520

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.