Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5

53 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic · profile
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
53
Shared sources
5
BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5.1Claude Haiku 4.5
BulletBenchmeasured by usCost per gameUS dollars $0.38$0.0318
BulletBenchmeasured by usGames lost on time% of games 37.5%0.0%
BulletBenchmeasured by usInvalid moves% of moves 0.0%0.9%
BulletBenchmeasured by usLadder Eloladder Elo 358491
BulletBenchmeasured by usMedian move timemilliseconds 5.4 s1.3 s
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 0.6%22.6%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 97.0%94.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 1.8%6.5%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 10.1%1.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 1.8%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 3.967.30
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 86.9%95.8%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 14.9%51.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 1.8%6.5%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel compliance% of products 100.0%92.3%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 0.0%7.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usConflicts caught% of conflicts 100.0%100.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 97.4%94.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usCost per productUS dollars $0.0991$0.0061
CatalogBenchmeasured by usDecision accuracy% of decisions 95.8%89.3%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usField accuracy% of missing fields 94.7%93.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usInvented values% of filled values 0.7%6.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 1.8%8.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 47.0%7.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 26.8%1.8%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 48.2%80.4%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 1.233.50
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 11.9%48.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 2.4%7.7%
ROASBenchmeasured by usAudience scorescore out of 100 67.730.9
ROASBenchmeasured by usBusiness scorescore out of 100 52.37.3
ROASBenchmeasured by usConsistency scorescore out of 100 33.38.7
ROASBenchmeasured by usContribution profitsimulated US dollars $965,271−$205,001
ROASBenchmeasured by usCost of a runUS dollars $2.49$0.0298
ROASBenchmeasured by usMonths over budgetmonths of 12 02
ROASBenchmeasured by usOverall scorescore out of 100 51.517.5
ROASBenchmeasured by usPlanning scorescore out of 100 54.654.4
ROASBenchmeasured by usReturn on ad spendprofit per $1 spent $0.64−$0.21
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4931,419
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5011,418
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4851,420
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4841,387
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5161,452
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4971,415
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5011,414
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,399
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 3.0%6.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.430.39
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 63.952.2

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.