Compare / Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

20 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Fable 5
Anthropic · profile
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
20
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Fable 5DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate 0.03-0.04
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate 0.17-0.02
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate 0.11-0.03
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate 0.00-0.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4831,455
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5031,460
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,5011,446
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5501,480
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,5091,452
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,5041,458
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,5081,451
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 81.0%40.7%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 70.6%36.8%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 62.5%12.5%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 84.2%12.7%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 95.8%73.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 91.9%68.1%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 2.0%34.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 74.268.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.