Compare / Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
59 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|---|
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Cost per gameUS dollars | $0.0318 | $0.0087 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Games lost on time% of games | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Invalid moves% of moves | 0.9% | 0.5% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Ladder Eloladder Elo | 491 | 707 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Median move timemilliseconds | 1.3 s | 0.8 s |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Cost per gameUS dollars | $0.0163 | $0.0058 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Games lost on time% of games | 25.0% | 0.0% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Invalid moves% of moves | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Ladder Eloladder Elo | 445 | 780 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Median move timemilliseconds | 1.2 s | 0.9 s |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Cost per gameUS dollars | $0.0095 | $0.0070 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Games lost on time% of games | 83.3% | 0.0% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Invalid moves% of moves | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Ladder Eloladder Elo | 33 | 892 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Median move timemilliseconds | 1.3 s | 0.9 s |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 39.3% | 6.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 94.4% | 94.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 6.5% | 21.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 14.3 | 8.83 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 99.4% | 97.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 51.2% | 35.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 6.5% | 10.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel compliance% of products | 76.8% | 98.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 23.2% | 1.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Conflicts caught% of conflicts | 100.0% | 84.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 94.6% | 95.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Cost per productUS dollars | $0.0061 | $0.0020 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Decision accuracy% of decisions | 86.0% | 91.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Field accuracy% of missing fields | 93.7% | 92.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Invented values% of filled values | 6.2% | 0.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 8.9% | 20.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 0.6% | 15.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 0.0% | 3.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 7.92 | 2.44 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 94.0% | 67.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 48.2% | 34.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 7.7% | 9.5% |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Audience scorescore out of 100 | 30.9 | 45.0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Business scorescore out of 100 | 7.3 | 12.6 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Consistency scorescore out of 100 | 8.7 | 21.8 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Contribution profitsimulated £ | -205,001 | 11,834 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Cost of a runUS dollars | $0.0298 | $0.0390 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Months over budgetmonths of 12 | 2 | 0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Overall scorescore out of 100 | 17.5 | 25.4 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Planning scorescore out of 100 | 54.4 | 54.9 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Return on ad spendprofit per £1 spent | −£0.21 | £0.01 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,418 | 1,448 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,420 | 1,454 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,387 | 1,435 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,452 | 1,467 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,415 | 1,444 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,414 | 1,456 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,399 | 1,442 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.