Compare / Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Llama 3.3 70B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,420 | 1,304 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,387 | 1,285 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,452 | 1,298 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,415 | 1,293 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,414 | 1,318 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,399 | 1,292 |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 95.3% | 53.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 54.4% | 8.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 53.6% | 21.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 68.7% | 31.9% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 62.5% | 100.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 86.5% | 88.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 78.7% | 76.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 83.5% | 10.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 6.0% | 10.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.39 | 0.37 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 52.2 | 26.2 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.