Compare / Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 5.3
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 5.3
21 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GLM 5.3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Cost per gameUS dollars | $0.0163 | $0.0156 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Games lost on time% of games | 25.0% | 83.3% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Invalid moves% of moves | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Ladder Eloladder Elo | 445 | 33 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Median move timemilliseconds | 1.2 s | 1.6 s |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Audience scorescore out of 100 | 30.9 | 51.0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Business scorescore out of 100 | 7.3 | 12.9 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Consistency scorescore out of 100 | 8.7 | 14.8 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Contribution profitsimulated US dollars | −$205,001 | $9,718 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Cost of a runUS dollars | $0.0298 | $0.13 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Months over budgetmonths of 12 | 2 | 0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Overall scorescore out of 100 | 17.5 | 24.8 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Planning scorescore out of 100 | 54.4 | 51.7 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Return on ad spendprofit per $1 spent | −$0.21 | $0.01 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,418 | 1,468 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,420 | 1,474 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,387 | 1,456 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,452 | 1,516 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,415 | 1,480 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,414 | 1,480 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,399 | 1,470 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.