Compare / Claude Opus 4.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking
13 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,459 | 1,371 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,472 | 1,367 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,469 | 1,332 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,503 | 1,401 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,483 | 1,357 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,474 | 1,368 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,467 | 1,343 |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Average% resolved | 60.6% | 32.1% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Front end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved | 41.2% | 25.0% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Greenfield (Commit0)% resolved | 37.5% | 12.5% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Information gathering (GAIA)% resolved | 69.1% | 32.7% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Issue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved | 76.6% | 56.8% |
| OpenHands Indexreported | Testing (SWT-Bench)% resolved | 78.5% | 33.3% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.