Compare / Claude Opus 4.5 vs gemini-3-flash

Claude Opus 4.5 vs gemini-3-flash

19 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic · profile
gemini-3-flash
Google · profile
Results compared
19
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.5gemini-3-flash
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4651,439
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,1871,191
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4591,468
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4721,469
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4691,457
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5031,496
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4831,458
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4741,473
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4661,461
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 60.6%49.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 41.2%22.1%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 37.5%18.8%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 69.1%58.8%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 76.6%70.7%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 70.0%68.0%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 84.0%82.5%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 51.8%51.8%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 78.1%70.2%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 92.3%91.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.