Compare / Claude Opus 4.5 vs Kimi K2 0711

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Kimi K2 0711

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic · profile
Kimi K2 0711
Moonshot AI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Opus 4.5Kimi K2 0711
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4721,409
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4691,371
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5031,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4831,381
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4741,418
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4671,375
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 90.8%87.3%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 73.8%29.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 68.4%50.6%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 77.5%59.1%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 68.8%75.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 89.7%81.6%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 79.8%78.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 84.5%66.5%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 3.0%22.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.390.29
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 70.452.5

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.