Compare / Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3
47 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 97.7% | 96.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 1.8% | 3.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 37.5% | 16.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 17.9% | 1.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 1.61 | 3.45 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 57.1% | 81.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 15.5% | 20.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 1.8% | 4.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel compliance% of products | 100.0% | 99.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Conflicts caught% of conflicts | 100.0% | 97.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 97.8% | 96.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Cost per productUS dollars | $0.0400 | $0.0469 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Decision accuracy% of decisions | 97.8% | 96.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Field accuracy% of missing fields | 92.2% | 94.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Invented values% of filled values | 0.5% | 5.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 3.0% | 4.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 72.6% | 61.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 58.9% | 41.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 14.9% | 15.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 0.41 | 0.82 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 15.5% | 24.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 1.8% | 3.0% |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Audience scorescore out of 100 | 67.7 | 65.1 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Business scorescore out of 100 | 52.3 | 40.2 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Consistency scorescore out of 100 | 33.8 | 28.3 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Contribution profitsimulated US dollars | $911,566 | $654,270 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Cost of a runUS dollars | $1.06 | $1.01 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Months over budgetmonths of 12 | 0 | 0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Overall scorescore out of 100 | 51.6 | 44.1 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Planning scorescore out of 100 | 54.6 | 54.7 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Return on ad spendprofit per $1 spent | $0.69 | $0.50 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Confirmed task successIPS effect estimate | 0.16 | 0.09 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Praise over complaintIPS effect estimate | 0.19 | 0.07 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | SteerabilityIPS effect estimate | 0.14 | -0.01 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Tool groundingIPS effect estimate | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,499 | 1,489 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,521 | 1,458 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,556 | 1,533 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,516 | 1,486 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,509 | 1,488 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,520 | 1,475 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.