Compare / Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs gemini-3-pro

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs gemini-3-pro

23 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic · profile
gemini-3-pro
Google · profile
Results compared
23
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricClaude Sonnet 4.5gemini-3-pro
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4491,451
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,1751,201
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4491,481
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4611,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4541,484
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4981,498
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4641,473
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4571,485
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4541,481
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 53.0%49.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 36.8%36.8%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 12.5%25.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 72.7%44.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 74.2%70.6%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 68.8%68.6%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 48.0%66.0%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 72.0%80.5%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 10.3%4.1%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 25.3%18.0%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 39.5%47.4%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 72.4%75.9%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 64.0%74.6%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 84.9%91.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.