Compare / Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs nanbeige4-3b-thinking-2511
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs nanbeige4-3b-thinking-2511
10 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | nanbeige4-3b-thinking-2511 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 95.0% | 83.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 65.0% | 36.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 61.4% | 51.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 73.2% | 51.4% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 68.8% | 75.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 88.7% | 81.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 81.1% | 79.4% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 81.0% | 21.5% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.41 | 0.26 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 66.9 | 9.8 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.