Compare / Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
42 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|---|
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Cost per gameUS dollars | $0.12 | $0.28 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Games lost on time% of games | 37.5% | 37.5% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Invalid moves% of moves | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Ladder Eloladder Elo | 557 | 839 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Median move timemilliseconds | 8.1 s | 5.6 s |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 1.2% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 97.2% | 99.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 0.6% | 5.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 26.8% | 72.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 12.5% | 67.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 1.67 | 0.07 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 60.7% | 3.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 20.8% | 20.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 3.0% | 1.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel compliance% of products | 99.4% | 100.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 1.2% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Conflicts caught% of conflicts | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 96.7% | 98.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Cost per productUS dollars | $0.0172 | $0.0371 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Decision accuracy% of decisions | 95.9% | 98.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Field accuracy% of missing fields | 91.5% | 94.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Invented values% of filled values | 0.8% | 1.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 1.2% | 6.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 47.6% | 77.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 32.1% | 75.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 37.5% | 1.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 1.02 | 0.02 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 19.1% | 17.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 3.0% | 1.8% |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Audience scorescore out of 100 | 61.8 | 68.6 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Business scorescore out of 100 | 57.2 | 57.5 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Consistency scorescore out of 100 | 28.5 | 44.7 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Contribution profitsimulated US dollars | $571,203 | $599,139 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Cost of a runUS dollars | $0.42 | $1.23 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Months over budgetmonths of 12 | 0 | 0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Overall scorescore out of 100 | 52.0 | 56.6 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Planning scorescore out of 100 | 55.1 | 54.9 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Return on ad spendprofit per $1 spent | $0.70 | $0.67 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.