Compare / c4ai-aya-expanse-32b vs GPT-5.2
c4ai-aya-expanse-32b vs GPT-5.2
8 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | c4ai-aya-expanse-32b | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,268 | 1,444 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,228 | 1,391 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,267 | 1,475 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,249 | 1,427 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,267 | 1,437 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,254 | 1,411 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.8% | 100.0% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 10.9% | 8.4% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.