Compare / DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Kimi K2 0711

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Kimi K2 0711

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
DeepSeek · profile
Kimi K2 0711
Moonshot AI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricDeepSeek V3.2 ExpKimi K2 0711
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4221,409
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4091,371
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4491,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4161,381
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4251,418
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4101,375
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 93.2%87.3%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 54.2%29.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 44.9%50.6%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 56.7%59.1%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 93.8%75.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 85.5%81.6%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 76.0%78.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 69.5%66.5%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 25.0%22.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.29
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 54.052.5

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.