Compare / Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

23 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google · profile
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Google · profile
Results compared
23
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemma 4 26B A4B
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4721,445
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4771,444
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4801,399
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5091,475
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4791,437
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4871,438
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4801,406
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 68.839.3
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 29.716.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 94.1%79.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 47.0%19.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 77.1%72.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 82.0%65.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 58.7%40.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 73.8%39.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 53.8%25.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 21.4%12.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 95.6%43.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 19.0%8.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.340.35
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 72.243.8
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.4%99.8%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 10.4%5.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.