Compare / Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Spark 1.3

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Spark 1.3

54 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google · profile
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta · profile
Results compared
54
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse Spark 1.3
BulletBenchmeasured by usCost per gameUS dollars $0.0446$0.0142
BulletBenchmeasured by usGames lost on time% of games 58.3%91.7%
BulletBenchmeasured by usInvalid moves% of moves 0.0%0.0%
BulletBenchmeasured by usLadder Eloladder Elo 52933
BulletBenchmeasured by usMedian move timemilliseconds 3.1 s4.2 s
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 12.5%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 96.6%97.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 6.0%5.4%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 3.6%14.3%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 0.0%7.1%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 7.213.44
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 95.8%84.5%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 16.1%14.3%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 1.8%3.6%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel compliance% of products 97.0%100.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usChannel rules broken% of products 3.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usConflicts caught% of conflicts 100.0%100.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usContent quality% of checks 96.5%97.2%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usCost per productUS dollars $0.0355$0.0164
CatalogBenchmeasured by usDecision accuracy% of decisions 94.8%96.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usFailed outputs% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usField accuracy% of missing fields 95.4%92.9%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usInvented values% of filled values 1.5%0.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usMissing UK information% of products 0.0%0.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usNot findable% of products 7.7%6.0%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usPublish-ready listings% of products 42.3%57.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usReliably publish-ready% of products 25.0%37.5%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claimsclaims per product 1.640.73
CatalogBenchmeasured by usUnsupported claims% of products 45.8%23.8%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong attributes% of products 14.9%16.7%
CatalogBenchmeasured by usWrong category or variant% of products 1.8%4.2%
ROASBenchmeasured by usAudience scorescore out of 100 67.551.6
ROASBenchmeasured by usBusiness scorescore out of 100 35.925.8
ROASBenchmeasured by usConsistency scorescore out of 100 33.926.7
ROASBenchmeasured by usContribution profitsimulated US dollars $507,736$337,251
ROASBenchmeasured by usCost of a runUS dollars $0.52$0.18
ROASBenchmeasured by usMonths over budgetmonths of 12 00
ROASBenchmeasured by usOverall scorescore out of 100 43.534.1
ROASBenchmeasured by usPlanning scorescore out of 100 54.954.8
ROASBenchmeasured by usReturn on ad spendprofit per $1 spent $0.42$0.29
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate -0.080.08
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate -0.010.04
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate -0.040.02
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate -0.000.00
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4591,468
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4721,479
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4771,506
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4801,450
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5091,527
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4791,486
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4871,494
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4801,466

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.