Compare / Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-6 Sol
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-6 Sol
35 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|---|
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Ladder Eloladder Elo | 683 | 0 |
| BulletBenchmeasured by us | Median move timemilliseconds | 6.2 s | 8.2 s |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 96.6% | 97.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 3.6% | 67.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 0.0% | 55.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 7.21 | 0.36 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel compliance% of products | 97.0% | 100.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Conflicts caught% of conflicts | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 96.5% | 97.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Cost per productUS dollars | $0.0355 | $0.0085 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Decision accuracy% of decisions | 94.8% | 97.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Field accuracy% of missing fields | 95.4% | 93.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Invented values% of filled values | 1.5% | 1.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 42.3% | 70.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 25.0% | 60.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 1.64 | 0.24 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Cost of a runUS dollars | $0.52 | $0.24 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Months over budgetmonths of 12 | 0 | 0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Overall scorescore out of 100 | 43.5 | 54.1 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Return on ad spendprofit per £1 spent | £0.42 | £0.65 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Confirmed task successIPS effect estimate | -0.08 | 0.11 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Praise over complaintIPS effect estimate | -0.01 | 0.11 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | SteerabilityIPS effect estimate | -0.04 | 0.15 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Tool groundingIPS effect estimate | -0.00 | 0.00 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,472 | 1,424 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,477 | 1,465 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,480 | 1,451 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,509 | 1,507 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,479 | 1,447 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,487 | 1,457 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,480 | 1,440 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.4% | 100.0% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 10.4% | 6.5% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.