Compare / Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs o4 Mini

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs o4 Mini

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Meta · profile
o4 Mini
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricLlama 3.2 1B Instructo4 Mini
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,0701,379
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,0831,337
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,0821,408
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,0861,369
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,1111,391
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,0761,354
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 51.6%87.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 3.2%35.3%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 0.0%41.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 10.8%53.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 43.8%81.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 38.4%81.3%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 11.8%70.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 0.0%75.5%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 22.0%19.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.330.33
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 11.846.9

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.