Models / GPT-5.5

OpenAI

GPT-5.5

56 published results from 6 sources. Each card shows where the number comes from and what it does not measure. Results are never combined into one score.

Provider
OpenAI
Sources
6
Our benchmarks
0
Price
Not yet published

Reported by others

-0.04
Confirmed task success · rank 25 of 46
Unit
IPS effect estimate, higher is better
Range
-0.06 to -0.03
Sample
64406 observations
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
28 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not a success rate: the estimated effect of choosing this model as the agent's orchestrator, against an even mix of the models tested, inside Arena's own harness.
-0.03
Confirmed task success · rank 23 of 46
Unit
IPS effect estimate, higher is better
Range
-0.05 to -0.01
Sample
42185 observations
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
28 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not a success rate: the estimated effect of choosing this model as the agent's orchestrator, against an even mix of the models tested, inside Arena's own harness.
0.05
Praise over complaint · rank 9 of 46
Unit
IPS effect estimate, higher is better
Range
0.02 to 0.08
Sample
21366 observations
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
28 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not a success rate: the estimated effect of choosing this model as the agent's orchestrator, against an even mix of the models tested, inside Arena's own harness.
0.08
Praise over complaint · rank 8 of 46
Unit
IPS effect estimate, higher is better
Range
0.05 to 0.11
Sample
14033 observations
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
28 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not a success rate: the estimated effect of choosing this model as the agent's orchestrator, against an even mix of the models tested, inside Arena's own harness.
0.02
Steerability · rank 11 of 46
Unit
IPS effect estimate, higher is better
Range
0.01 to 0.04
Sample
77644 observations
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
28 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not a success rate: the estimated effect of choosing this model as the agent's orchestrator, against an even mix of the models tested, inside Arena's own harness.
0.07
Steerability · rank 4 of 46
Unit
IPS effect estimate, higher is better
Range
0.05 to 0.09
Sample
47527 observations
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
28 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not a success rate: the estimated effect of choosing this model as the agent's orchestrator, against an even mix of the models tested, inside Arena's own harness.
0.00
Tool grounding · rank 1 of 46
Unit
IPS effect estimate, higher is better
Range
0.00 to 0.00
Sample
1990689 observations
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
28 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not a success rate: the estimated effect of choosing this model as the agent's orchestrator, against an even mix of the models tested, inside Arena's own harness.
0.00
Tool grounding · rank 1 of 46
Unit
IPS effect estimate, higher is better
Range
0.00 to 0.00
Sample
2518969 observations
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
28 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not a success rate: the estimated effect of choosing this model as the agent's orchestrator, against an even mix of the models tested, inside Arena's own harness.
1,483
Overall · rank 2 of 44
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,476 to 1,489
Sample
21279 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
13 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,480
Overall · rank 5 of 44
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,474 to 1,487
Sample
20944 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5 (high)
Measured
13 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,224
Overall · rank 2 of 34
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,218 to 1,229
Sample
89873 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
24 Aug 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,482
Overall · rank 4 of 177
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,480 to 1,485
Sample
70523 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not an error rate: claims that cannot be checked on the web are skipped, and preference still carries most of the weight.
1,486
Overall · rank 3 of 177
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,483 to 1,489
Sample
68926 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not an error rate: claims that cannot be checked on the web are skipped, and preference still carries most of the weight.
1,486
Business, management and finance · rank 7 of 402
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,479 to 1,492
Sample
14097 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,489
Business, management and finance · rank 3 of 402
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,483 to 1,496
Sample
13739 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,449
Creative writing · rank 20 of 407
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,442 to 1,456
Sample
13078 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,452
Creative writing · rank 18 of 407
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,445 to 1,458
Sample
12802 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,511
Expert prompts · rank 10 of 359
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,503 to 1,519
Sample
7644 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,513
Expert prompts · rank 10 of 359
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,505 to 1,520
Sample
7384 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,475
Instruction following · rank 13 of 409
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,470 to 1,480
Sample
24807 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,478
Instruction following · rank 11 of 409
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,473 to 1,483
Sample
24017 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,477
Overall · rank 19 of 409
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,473 to 1,480
Sample
70635 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,481
Overall · rank 13 of 409
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,478 to 1,485
Sample
69008 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,467
Writing, literature and language · rank 15 of 408
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,461 to 1,472
Sample
18231 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,470
Writing, literature and language · rank 11 of 408
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,464 to 1,475
Sample
17866 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.5 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
44.2%
Consistency (pass^5) · rank 1 of 2
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
1 Jul 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: it runs inside STATE-Bench's agent loop against simulated users, and versions of the benchmark are not comparable.
59.0%
Customer support task success (pass@1) · rank 1 of 2
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
1 Jul 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: it runs inside STATE-Bench's agent loop against simulated users, and versions of the benchmark are not comparable.
55.0%
Shopping assistant task success (pass@1) · rank 1 of 2
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
1 Jul 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: it runs inside STATE-Bench's agent loop against simulated users, and versions of the benchmark are not comparable.
58.9%
Task success (pass@1) · rank 1 of 2
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
1 Jul 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: it runs inside STATE-Bench's agent loop against simulated users, and versions of the benchmark are not comparable.
62.0%
Travel task success (pass@1) · rank 1 of 2
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
1 Jul 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: it runs inside STATE-Bench's agent loop against simulated users, and versions of the benchmark are not comparable.
3.62
User experience · rank 2 of 2
Unit
score from 1 to 5, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
1 Jul 2026
Not shown
Not real customer satisfaction: the ratings come from a model-based judge.
Reported by OpenHands Index
65.9%
Average · rank 5 of 34
Unit
% resolved, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
30 Jun 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: the score is for the model inside the OpenHands agent, at the SDK version shown.
Reported by OpenHands Index
38.2%
Front end (SWE-Bench Multimodal) · rank 10 of 34
Unit
% resolved, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
30 Jun 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: the score is for the model inside the OpenHands agent, at the SDK version shown.
Reported by OpenHands Index
43.8%
Greenfield (Commit0) · rank 8 of 34
Unit
% resolved, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
30 Jun 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: the score is for the model inside the OpenHands agent, at the SDK version shown.
Reported by OpenHands Index
86.1%
Information gathering (GAIA) · rank 1 of 34
Unit
% resolved, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
30 Jun 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: the score is for the model inside the OpenHands agent, at the SDK version shown.
Reported by OpenHands Index
78.2%
Issue resolution (SWE-Bench) · rank 5 of 34
Unit
% resolved, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
30 Jun 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: the score is for the model inside the OpenHands agent, at the SDK version shown.
Reported by OpenHands Index
83.4%
Testing (SWT-Bench) · rank 3 of 34
Unit
% resolved, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
30 Jun 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: the score is for the model inside the OpenHands agent, at the SDK version shown.
Reported by tau2-bench
29.9%
Consistency (pass^4) · rank 4 of 21
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
22 Jul 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
44.6%
Task success (pass^1) · rank 5 of 21
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
22 Jul 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
42.0%
Requested-length error · rank 295 of 370
Unit
% off the requested word count, lower is better
Configuration
GPT-5.5 (high)
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not other format limits such as character counts or bullet counts.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
96.0%
Requested-length error · rank 346 of 370
Unit
% off the requested word count, lower is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not other format limits such as character counts or bullet counts.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
71.0%
Requested-length error · rank 330 of 370
Unit
% off the requested word count, lower is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not other format limits such as character counts or bullet counts.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
98.0%
Requested-length error · rank 347 of 370
Unit
% off the requested word count, lower is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not other format limits such as character counts or bullet counts.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
13.0%
Requested-length error · rank 103 of 370
Unit
% off the requested word count, lower is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not other format limits such as character counts or bullet counts.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
0.41
Style adherence · rank 11 of 370
Unit
score from 0 to 1, higher is better
Configuration
GPT-5.5 (high)
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not brand voice on your own examples: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
0.41
Style adherence · rank 17 of 370
Unit
score from 0 to 1, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not brand voice on your own examples: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
0.41
Style adherence · rank 14 of 370
Unit
score from 0 to 1, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not brand voice on your own examples: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
0.40
Style adherence · rank 33 of 370
Unit
score from 0 to 1, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not brand voice on your own examples: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
0.40
Style adherence · rank 19 of 370
Unit
score from 0 to 1, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not brand voice on your own examples: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
67.9
Writing score · rank 42 of 370
Unit
score out of 100, higher is better
Configuration
GPT-5.5 (high)
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not business copy quality: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing, and models that often refuse get no score.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
58.7
Writing score · rank 109 of 370
Unit
score out of 100, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not business copy quality: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing, and models that often refuse get no score.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
64.8
Writing score · rank 67 of 370
Unit
score out of 100, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not business copy quality: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing, and models that often refuse get no score.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
51.5
Writing score · rank 150 of 370
Unit
score out of 100, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not business copy quality: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing, and models that often refuse get no score.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
69.7
Writing score · rank 27 of 370
Unit
score out of 100, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.5
Measured
25 Apr 2026
Not shown
Not business copy quality: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing, and models that often refuse get no score.
100.0%
Answer rate · rank 1 of 108
Unit
% of documents, higher is better
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
22 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not a quality score: a low rate usually means content filters were triggered, and hallucination rates are measured on answered documents only.
9.3%
Hallucination rate · rank 47 of 108
Unit
% of summaries, lower is better
Configuration
GPT-5.5
Measured
22 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not errors in open questions or other tasks: only summarisation, judged by Vectara's own model (HHEM-2.3), not by people, on news-style documents rather than your data.

Compare GPT-5.5 with