Compare / Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.5

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.5

20 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic · profile
GPT-5.5
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
20
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4781,483
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,2011,224
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4611,486
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4821,489
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4491,452
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5061,513
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4751,478
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4721,481
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4551,470
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 44.5%65.9%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 30.9%38.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 50.0%43.8%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 13.3%86.1%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 74.4%78.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 54.0%83.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 2.0%13.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.410.41
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 64.569.7
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.9%100.0%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 10.6%9.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.